cointelegraph.com

IRS crypto broker rules, explained: What you need to know in 2025

How does the IRS define a crypto broker?

The definition of the term “broker” includes individuals or entities that regularly provide services to carry out digital asset transfers. This definition ensures that only those truly “in a position to know” transaction details are subject to Form 1099-DA reporting requirements.

These US Internal Revenue Service rules are built on prior rulemaking (T.D. 10000) from July 2024 and focus on extending broker reporting obligations to decentralized finance (DeFi), which involves digital asset transactions without a traditional intermediary. 

T.D. 10021 introduces the term “digital asset middleman,” which the IRS previously delayed due to its complexity and controversy.

The broker reporting mandate originates from the 2021 Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, also known as the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. It expanded existing broker reporting obligations under Sections 6045 and 6045A to include digital assets. The provision is projected to generate nearly $28 billion in revenue over a decade.

Entities classified as brokers include:

Digital asset exchanges: Both custodial and non-custodial platforms that execute trades.Hosted wallet providers: Those managing wallets and verifying user identities.Digital asset kiosks: Bitcoin ATMs and other physical kiosks dealing in cryptocurrencies.Crypto payment processors: Platforms that facilitate digital asset transactions while verifying buyers and sellers.DeFi brokers: Only front-end service providers, such as token swap interfaces, are considered brokers. Activities like liquidity provision, staking and lending remain exempt from reporting requirements.

Providers of “unhosted” wallets, where users retain full control over their private keys, are generally exempt unless they function similarly to an exchange.

The definition of a digital asset broker has been highly debated after the enactment of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act in November 2021.

How the IRS expands the definition of “broker” in digital asset transactions

The Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (Public Law 117-58), specifically Section 80603, broadened the definition of “broker” under Internal Revenue Code Section 6045 to include those facilitating digital asset transfers. 

Internal Revenue Service regulations broadly define brokers as entities engaged in digital asset sales or exchanges. Here is a timeline of the regulations:

Custodial brokers (June 2024 — Treasury Decision 10000)

Custodial brokers include operators of custodial digital asset trading platforms, such as centralized exchanges (CEXs) that hold customers’ private keys. It extends to hosted wallet providers, digital asset kiosks (e.g., Bitcoin ATMs) and certain processors of digital asset payments, such as crypto payment processors. These entities must report because they have custody, making it feasible to track transactions.

DeFi brokers (December 2024 — Treasury Decision 10021)

The IRS’s December 2024 regulations focus on trading front-end service providers in the DeFi ecosystem, such as interfaces that connect users to decentralized exchanges (DEXs). The Treasury and IRS use a three-part model (interface, application, settlement layers) to identify DeFi participants, focusing on those with sufficient control or influence, aligning with Financial Action Task Force (FATF) guidance.

However, as DeFi platforms lack centralized control, there were concerns about privacy and compliance. 

Efforts to repeal the IRS broker rule

In March 2025, discussions on repealing the DeFi broker rules intensified, with the Senate voting 70–27 on March 4 and the House voting 292–132 on March 11, to repeal the DeFi broker rules under the Congressional Review Act (CRA), as detailed in House Vote on Repeal. 

President Donald Trump has signaled support, with his crypto czar, David Sacks, affirming the administration’s backing to the repeal. If signed, this repeal would permanently bar the IRS from implementing similar regulations, significantly impacting DeFi reporting.

With bipartisan support, including 76 Democrats joining Republicans in the House vote, this reflects broader political shifts toward supporting crypto innovation, especially under President Trump’s pro-crypto stance, as seen in his executive order for a national crypto stockpile.

Did you know? Five draft Forms 1099-DA and three draft Final Instruction versions preceded the finalized IRS crypto broker rules. On Jan. 8, 2025, the IRS issued updated 2025 General Instructions for Certain Information Returns, which included instructions for Form 1099-DA.

What is Form 1099-DA? The new crypto tax form for 2025

Form 1099-DA, titled “Digital Asset Proceeds from Broker Transactions,” is a new tax form introduced by the IRS to standardize the reporting of digital asset transactions, such as those involving cryptocurrencies. It was released on Dec. 5, 2024.

It’s designed to help taxpayers accurately report their gains or losses from selling or exchanging digital assets and to ensure the IRS can track this income more effectively. Think of it as a specialized version of other 1099 forms — like the 1099-B used for stocks — but tailored for the unique world of crypto and other blockchain-based assets.

The form requires “brokers” (like crypto exchanges or platforms) to report specific details about your digital asset sales or exchanges to both you and the IRS. For transactions in 2025, brokers must report:

Customers’ name, address and Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN)The date and time of each transactionThe amount and type of digital asset sold (e.g., Bitcoin, Ether), including a unique nine-digit code from the Digital Token Identification Foundation (DTIF) to identify itThe gross proceeds (the total amount customers received in US dollars) from the sale.

Along with the crypto brokers, if you (i.e., a taxpayer resident in the US) sell or swap crypto through a broker, you’ll get a Form 1099-DA to use when filing your taxes. You’re still responsible for reporting all taxable crypto events, even if no form is issued (e.g., for trades on non-reporting platforms).

Key dates include:

Gross proceeds reporting: Begins for transactions on or after Jan. 1, 2025, with reports due in early 2026. This means you’ll receive your first Form 1099-DA for 2025 trades, due to you by Jan. 31, 2026, and to the IRS by Feb. 28 (or March 31 if filed electronically).Basis reporting: Starts for transactions on or after Jan. 1, 2026, including cost basis and gain/loss character for certain brokers.

Why is this new form required?

Before Form 1099-DA, crypto tax reporting was a mess. Some exchanges issued Forms 1099-MISC or 1099-B, while others provided nothing, leaving taxpayers to manually track their trades. This inconsistency made it hard for people to report accurately and for the IRS to verify income. Thus, it’s part of a broader push to close the tax gap and bring crypto in line with traditional financial reporting.

Did you know? Unlike stock reporting, where Form 1099-B covers everything cleanly, crypto’s decentralized nature and lack of universal identifiers posed challenges. Form 1099-DA tackles this with the DTIF code and a focus on digital assets — defined as any blockchain-recorded value, like cryptocurrencies or non-fungible tokens (NFTs), but not cash.

How Form 1099-DA shifts crypto reporting

On Jan. 10, 2025, the IRS released the final version of Form 1099-DA, titled “Digital Asset Proceeds From Broker Transactions.” Brokers have been instructed to use this form to report specific digital asset transactions occurring from 2025 onward. 

Herein are the key highlights of the new Form 1099-DA and its implications:

Transition rule for tokenized securities

Digital assets previously reported under Form 1099-B, such as tokenized securities, must now shift to Form 1099-DA. For instance, sales of tokenized stocks or bonds should be reported on Form 1099-DA instead of Form 1099-B. 

However, a transitional rule for 2025 allows brokers to report cash sales of tokenized securities on either Form 1099-B or Form 1099-DA. This flexibility gives traditional brokers — who may not typically handle digital assets — extra time to update their systems for full compliance by 2026, as outlined in Treasury Decision 10000.

Form 1099-DA

Exception in tokenized securities rule

An exception to the general rule applies to tokenized securities settled or cleared on a Limited-Access Regulated Network (LARN). These transactions must be reported on Form 1099-B, not Form 1099-DA. 

If a LARN loses its regulated status, brokers can continue using Form 1099-B for affected transactions through the end of that calendar year, ensuring consistency during regulatory shifts.

Form 1099-B

Customer-provided acquisition information

Form 1099-DA includes a new checkbox (Box 8) that brokers must mark if they relied on customer-provided acquisition information to calculate the basis. 

This ties to final regulations allowing brokers to use such data for specific identification — pinpointing what units were sold or transferred — and requires them to disclose its use. This change, per Treasury Decision 10021, helps taxpayers align their records with broker reports.

Did you know? According to the 2025 General Instructions, Form 1099-DA electronic filing is required through the Information Reporting Intake System (IRIS), and Filing Information Returns Electronically System (FIRE) is not an option.

Noncovered status

Like Form 1099-B, Form 1099-DA requires brokers to indicate in Box 9 if a digital asset is a “noncovered security,” meaning its basis isn’t reported to the IRS. 

Unlike earlier drafts, the updated form no longer requires an explanation in Box 10 for this status — Box 10 is now reserved for future use. This simplifies reporting for assets acquired before basis tracking rules apply (e.g., pre-2026 purchases).

Number of decimal places

Brokers were earlier required to report the number of units of digital assets sold and transferred up to 10 decimal places. This requirement has been extended to 18 decimal places, reflecting the precision necessary in reporting digital asset transactions.​

Proceeds clarification

Total proceeds from the digital asset transaction should exclude gross proceeds from the initial sale of a specified non-fungible token (NFT) created or minted by the recipient. These amounts are instead reported separately in Box 11c, distinguishing creator earnings from secondary sales, per updated instructions.

Transfer date 

Box 12b records the date digital assets were transferred into a custodial account. The final instructions specify that this box should be left blank if the digital assets were transferred on various dates, accommodating scenarios where multiple transfers occur.​

Qualifying stablecoins and specified NFTs

Optional reporting for sales of qualifying stablecoins and specified NFTs comes with specific instructions. For specified NFTs, brokers enter code “999999999” in Box 1a and “Specified NFTs” in Box 1b. This ensures unique assets, like rare digital collectibles, are tracked distinctly from cryptocurrencies or stablecoins.

Applicable checkbox on Form 8949

Brokers must use new codes — G, H, J, K and Y — on Form 1099-DA to match the recipient’s Form 8949 (Sales and Other Dispositions of Capital Assets) for the tax year. These codes help taxpayers correctly categorize gains or losses, linking broker reports to tax filings seamlessly.

Form 8949

Did you know? If asset sales remain unspecified, the IRS will apply first-in, first-out, which might lead to the taxpayer paying higher taxes.

How IRS crypto broker rules affect taxpayers

The IRS rolled out new cryptocurrency tax reporting rules effective Jan. 1, 2025, targeting brokers and investors with stricter record-keeping and reporting requirements. These changes aim to boost tax compliance and ensure digital asset transactions are reported accurately, bringing crypto in line with traditional financial assets. 

Here’s what’s new and what it means for you.

Cost basis tracking per account: Under the updated rules, crypto investors must now track their cost basis — the original purchase price — separately for each account or wallet, ditching the old universal tracking approach. For every transaction, you’ll need to record the purchase date, acquisition cost and specific details, like the wallet it’s tied to. Starting in 2025, brokers — like centralized exchanges — must report these transactions to the IRS using Form 1099-DA, mirroring how banks report stock trades. This shift, detailed in Treasury Decision 10000 (June 2024), closes loopholes by tying gains to specific accounts, making it harder to obscure taxable events.Specific identification required for transactions: The new regulations require taxpayers to use specific identification for each digital asset sale, pinpointing the exact purchase date, amount and cost of the asset sold. If you don’t provide this, the IRS defaults to the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method — selling your oldest coins first — which could inflate taxable gains if early purchases had lower costs. Previously, many investors averaged their cost basis across all holdings, a simpler but less precise method. This change, effective in 2025, demands detailed records to avoid unexpected tax bills.Temporary safe harbor: To ease the switch, the IRS offers a temporary safe harbor under Revenue Procedure 2024-28. If you’ve been using a universal cost basis method, you have until Dec. 31, 2025, to reallocate your basis across accounts or wallets accurately. This one-time grace period lets you adjust records without penalty, but you’ll need to act fast — brokers won’t report basis until 2026 transactions, so 2025 is on you to get it right.Penalties for noncompliance: Messing up these rules comes with a cost. The IRS has upped the stakes for 2025, increasing fines for underreporting crypto income, adding interest on unpaid taxes, and ramping up audits for mismatched gains and losses. Notice 2024-56 provides penalty relief for brokers making a good faith effort in 2025, but taxpayers don’t get the same leniency — noncompliance could trigger scrutiny, especially with Form 1099-DA giving the IRS clearer data to cross-check.

Notably, the IRS’s updated crypto broker rules also affect non-domiciled taxpayers — those living outside the US but subject to IRS reporting — by mandating detailed cost basis tracking for each account and specific identification of digital asset sales on Form 1099-DA, regardless of where they reside. 

For example, a US citizen in Europe or a foreign national with US-based crypto income must now maintain precise records of purchase dates and costs per wallet, facing increased compliance efforts and potential tax obligations on US-sourced gains.

From tracking cost basis per account to facing steeper penalties, these changes aim to align crypto with traditional finance, offering a brief safe harbor to adapt but signaling a clear shift: Compliance is no longer optional, and the tax net now stretches globally, leaving little room for oversight as the crypto landscape matures.

Read more at cointelegraph.com

Bitso to launch Mexican peso-pegged stablecoin on Arbitrum

Bitso Business, an arm of the Mexican crypto exchange Bitso, will launch a Mexican peso-pegged stablecoin on the Ethereum layer-2 network Arbitrum.

The stablecoin, MXNB, will be issued and managed by Bitso’s newly established subsidiary Juno and will be fully fiat-backed by Mexican pesos on a one-to-one basis, Bitso Business said in a March 26 statement.

Bitso Business’ head of stablecoins, Ben Reid, said a primary use case for MXNB could be to promote foreign investment and trade in Latin American economies by providing a more “efficient way” to do business compared to traditional finance infrastructure.

“Global companies face significant monetary challenges when it comes to serving customers in new markets and conducting cross-border payments, including high intermediary costs and inefficient transaction times,” he said.

Juno will operate independently from Bitso to manage the stablecoin and will conduct regular audits of its reserves, providing public attestation reports on the token’s website.

Mexico big on remittances 

Crypto research firm Chainalysis reported in October that Mexico was an “important country to watch for its embrace of cryptocurrency-based remittances.” 

The World Bank estimated in June 2023 that Mexico received $61 billion in remittances per year, mostly from the US, making it the world’s second-largest receiver.

Chainalysis found that Latin America was the second-fastest growing region globally behind sub-Saharan Africa for crypto transaction value received, and from July 2023 to June 2024, Latin Americans received $415 billion in crypto — a year-on-year increase of around 42.5%.

Bitso to launch Mexican peso-pegged stablecoin on Arbitrum

Source: Chainanlysis

Bitso’s Latin America Crypto Landscape report found stablecoin purchases on the exchange had surged by 9% as people turned to US dollar stablecoins such as USDC (USDC) and Tether (USDT) to guard against rising fiat inflation and devaluation of local currencies.

“In Latin America, challenging macroeconomic conditions, characterized by high inflation and currency devaluations, drove increased cryptocurrency adoption — particularly stablecoins — as a reliable store of value,” the report said.

Related: Circle integrates USDC with national payment systems of Brazil, Mexico

While USDC and USDT seem to be the most used stablecoins in Latin American countries, several Mexican peso-pegged stablecoins have gone into circulation over the past few years. 

The most notable is Tether’s MXNT, which launched on Ethereum, Polygon and Tron in 2022. At the time, Tether’s then-chief technology officer, CEO Paolo Ardoino, touted the token as a store of value for Mexican crypto users and a way to smooth the transition from fiat pesos to crypto.

Other smaller players in the peso-pegged stablecoin market include MMXN, which is backed by Monetary Digital, and MXNe, which was launched by US-based issuer Brale on Solana and Stellar networks in 2024.

Magazine: What it’s actually like to use Bitcoin in El Salvador

Read more at cointelegraph.com

Bear markets are temporary — airdrops are forever

Opinion by: Paul Delio, chief business officer at CARV

Market movements come and go, naturally taking up a lot of crypto oxygen, but something far more remarkable has been happening beneath the surface in recent cycles. The past few years have generally been great for new tokens, and with their launches come significant opportunities for wealth creation, such as airdrops.

I recently sat down with Animoca Brands co-founder and executive chairman Yat Siu at Consensus Hong Kong. He mentioned a figure that instantly cured any market anxiety: $49 billion worth of airdrops were distributed directly to Web3 communities from 2021 to 2024. “I can’t think of a larger private wealth generation event than that,” Siu noted.

He’s entirely correct. Airdrops get users in at the ground floor and reward them for early support in ways traditional markets simply can’t or don’t. We can all share in one of the most significant wealth redistributions in recent history through this unique mechanism. 

While current sentiment might make some think twice, there’s still great user and network value building in the background. Bear markets are temporary, but airdrops — and the ownership and community models they enable in crypto — are forever.

Airdrops transform ownership 

Airdrops are much more than free tokens — they’re a relationship reimagining between platforms and users. The value they bring to protocols goes beyond inherent pricing.

In the traditional tech world, users have unfortunately gotten used to creating value and receiving nothing in return. 

This is the business model of many of today’s most prominent companies: feasting on information, extracting its value and selling to the highest bidder. When users don’t own their data, tech corporations weaponize it for revenue and influence.

Airdrops challenge this status quo. The model honors participation with ownership stakes and real-world value. If you use a project, airdrops posit that you should share in it. Passive users become active stakeholders who champion the ecosystem and bring it to new heights. 

Recent: Kaito AI token defies influencer selling pressure with 50% price rally

The data and decision-making have-nots are in the driver’s seat for once. From layer 2s offering governance tokens to early users or projects rewarding backers, airdrops rewrite the ownership rulebook and create lasting protocol-user stickiness. This ownership unlocks engagement that often persists regardless of market conditions.

Airdrops create ecosystems

Community makes or breaks projects in Web3. As Siu pointed out, network effects are one of the most valuable assets in digital economies. Airdrops have become a crypto cornerstone precisely because they bootstrap these effects.

Airdrops seed those with skin in the game and fund thousands of microeconomies. Value flows between participants rather than being extracted by centralized entities, creating a flywheel of innovation that self-reinforces. Tokenholders become evangelists, developers, participants and builders — moving projects from speculation to sustainability in bull and bear markets.

Some people try to game airdrops, while others are only motivated by profit. Teams are working on both counts to weed out bad actors and give preference to genuine supporters. Nonetheless, it’s hard to see the virtuous cycles of airdrops as anything but transformative. And, like we saw with Axie Infinity in the Philippines, they successfully onboard new crypto audiences.

Airdrops deliver enduring value

Web3 wants active users who engage with protocols and actively benefit from them. If we grow, you grow. This ethos is what crypto is all about. It is also seen with node sales rewarding network decentralization and AI agents tracking data on the blockchain and paying users when used in training.

These functions unlock user and network value despite market ups and downs. Of course, there’s a financial upside, but governance rights, community belonging and genuine buy-in also exist. Then, if and when markets rebound, users are already strapped in for the ride and benefit from their loyalty.

What is the best advice in these rocky recent weeks? Forget about market movements and look at what airdrops deliver. $49 billion is nothing to sneeze at, nor are the very real and lasting connections and communities.

Opinion by: Paul Delio, chief business officer at CARV.

This article is for general information purposes and is not intended to be and should not be taken as legal or investment advice. The views, thoughts, and opinions expressed here are the author’s alone and do not necessarily reflect or represent the views and opinions of Cointelegraph.

Read more at cointelegraph.com

Trump’s USD1 stablecoin deepens concerns over conflicts of interest

World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the Trump family’s crypto project, is planning to release a stablecoin, raising concern over the US president’s exposure to the digital asset industry.

The project released a memecoin immediately prior to President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the price of which skyrocketed and crashed soon after, causing many to accuse WLFI of a pump-and-dump scheme.

WLFI also made multimillion-dollar purchases of crypto tokens immediately prior to important crypto-related events the president has attended or announcements influencing the industry. WLFI purchased $20 million of various tokens ahead of the March 7 White House Crypto Summit. 

As World Liberty Financial’s portfolio grows and regulator oversight disappears from the crypto industry, observers and legal scholars are becoming increasingly concerned over conflicts of interest within the Trump administration. 

Trump’s USD1 stablecoin deepens concerns over conflicts of interest

Son Eric Trump pumps his father’s memecoin ahead of the inauguration. Source: Eric Trump

Trump’s stablecoin, USD1, riddled with liabilities 

WLFI announced on March 25 that it will launch the new stablecoin USD1, “100% backed by short-term US government treasuries, US dollar deposits, and other cash equivalents.”

WLFI co-founder Zach Witkoff said in the announcement that the coin can be used for “seamless, secure cross-border transactions.” 

News of USD1’s forthcoming release came just days after WLFI secured more than $500 million through the sale of its own WLFI tokens. 

Observers have already begun to raise the alarm about the possible security risks posed by a stablecoin connected to the president. There are also concerns over the possibility of market manipulation and violations of the emoluments clause of the US Constitution — a section of the document that protects against undue influence over American leaders. 

As regards the latter, cyber and digital media attorney Andrew Rossow told Cointelegraph that the stablecoin is “a direct affront to constitutional safeguards meant to prevent conflicts of interest.”

“With Trump and his family controlling 60% of World Liberty’s equity interests, the USD1 stablecoin could facilitate indirect financial gains or undue foreign influence over US policy, particularly if foreign entities invest in or use the stablecoin.”

Trump’s USD1 stablecoin deepens concerns over conflicts of interest

WLFI makes up a sizeable chunk of Trump’s estimated net worth. Source: Fortune

Corey Frayer, who worked on crypto policy at the Securities and Exchange Commission under former President Joe Biden, said that the project’s emphasis on cross-border payments was particularly worrisome and that foreign entities may invest as a way to gain favor with Trump.

“There’s a lot of opacity around this marketplace, and prior relationships with illicit finance,” Frayer told The New York Times. 

US policymakers have already noted the possibility for foreign influence following the launch of Trump’s eponymous memecoin in January.

At the time, Democratic Representative Maxine Waters — a top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee — wrote that “anyone globally, even individuals who have been sanctioned by the U.S. or banned from our capital markets, can now trade and profit off of $TRUMP through various unregulated platforms.”

Related: Congress repealed the IRS broker rule, but can it regulate DeFi?

In addition to potential foreign influence, observers are concerned that Trump’s crypto ventures could threaten market stability and integrity and open up global markets to manipulation. 

Referencing USD1, Heath Mayo, founder of the Trump-alternative conservative movement Principles First, said that a sitting president issuing an instrument backed by public debt should be illegal, adding that the project had “terrible incentives and corrupt use of US taxpayer credit.”

Rossow said that the president’s role in a stablecoin project while at the same time working to craft stablecoin legislation in the form of the GENIUS Act is “a constitutional violation that could destabilize regulatory integrity.”

Trump’s influence over the industry and ability to drop enforcement actions against crypto executives who support him create “an uneven playing field, disadvantaging competitors and violating principles of equal protection under the law.”

Options for Trump’s crypto conflicts of interest

Trump, who has long stated an affinity with former President Andrew Jackson, seems to be holding to the latter’s strategy of acknowledging judicial rulings — and then doing what he wants regardless. 

The presidential administration has already shown that it is willing to defy orders from federal judges when, earlier this month, it ignored a verbal order from a federal judge to turn around two planes full of alleged gang members bound for the Terrorism Confinement Center in El Salvador. 

Regarding crypto, Senator Elizabeth Warren has already called for an ethics probe into Trump’s crypto activities. She said that the president’s memecoin “massively enriched Trump personally, enabled a mechanism for the crypto industry to funnel cash to him, and created a volatile financial asset that allows anyone in the world to financially speculate on Trump’s political fortunes.”

Trump’s USD1 stablecoin deepens concerns over conflicts of interest

Warren, a longtime crypto critic, has taken aim at WLFI. Source: Senate Banking Committee

The probe, if it had a chance to begin with, doesn’t appear to have gone anywhere, and Congressional Republicans are busy working on the GENIUS Act, which even has the support of a handful of Democrats. 

What, if anything, can be done?

Rossow said that, despite changes in SEC leadership, other agencies like the Financial Crime Enforcement Network could still pursue investigations. 

He also noted that state-level action from local regulators and attorneys general is “not just possible but imperative, especially in states with robust consumer protection laws.”

He added that international regulatory bodies could exert pressure, stating that the “global nature” of crypto means that foreign governments could work for better oversight and more robust regulations. 

Related: Who’s running in Trump’s race to make US a ‘Bitcoin superpower?’

In any case, he said that the current situation demands multifaceted action, as there is currently a need to “safeguard the principles of fair governance and maintain the US’s credibility in the global financial system.”

Some in the crypto industry see no problem at all and believe the president’s involvement is just another sign of how the industry is reaching mainstream appeal. 

Chris Barrett, senior director of communications at Chainlink, congratulated the project, stating that “the global financial world runs on the U.S. dollar, and stablecoins are about to make that even harder to change.”

Arnoud Star Busmann, CEO of European stablecoin issuer Quantoz Payments, told Cointelegraph that USD1 is reflective of “increasing validation from world-leading brands that stablecoins are carving the path for the mainstream financial industry to access crypto assets and tokenized real-world assets.”

The Blockchain Association — an industry lobby group — declined Cointelegraph’s request for comment. 

Magazine: Arbitrum co-founder skeptical of move to based and native rollups: Steven Goldfeder

Read more at cointelegraph.com

Trump’s USD1 stablecoin deepens concerns over conflicts of interest

World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the Trump family’s crypto project, is planning to release a stablecoin, raising concern over the US president’s exposure to the digital asset industry.

The project released a memecoin immediately prior to President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the price of which skyrocketed and crashed soon after, causing many to accuse WLFI of a pump-and-dump scheme. 

WLFI has also made multimillion-dollar purchases of crypto tokens immediately prior to important crypto-related events the president has attended or announcements influencing the industry. WLFI purchased $20 million of various tokens ahead of the March 7 White House Crypto Summit. 

As World Liberty Financial’s portfolio grows and regulator oversight disappears from the crypto industry, observers and legal scholars are becoming increasingly concerned over conflicts of interest within the Trump administration. 

Trump’s USD1 stablecoin deepens concerns over conflicts of interest

Son Eric Trump pumps his father’s memecoin ahead of the inauguration. Source: Eric Trump

Trump’s stablecoin USD1 riddled with liabilities 

WLFI announced on March 25 that it will launch the new stablecoin USD1, “100% backed by short-term US government treasuries, US dollar deposits, and other cash equivalents.”

WLFI co-founder Zach Witkoff said in the announcement that the coin can be used for “seamless, secure cross-border transactions.” 

News of USD1’s forthcoming release came just days after WLFI secured more than $500 million through the sale of its own $WLFI tokens. 

Observers have already begun to raise the alarm about the possible security risks posed by a stablecoin connected to the president. There are also concerns over the possibility of market manipulation and violations of the emoluments clause of the US Constitution — a section of the document that protects against undue influence over American leaders. 

As regards the latter, cyber and digital media attorney Andrew Rossow told Cointelegraph that the stablecoin is “a direct affront to constitutional safeguards meant to prevent conflicts of interest.”

“With Trump and his family controlling 60% of World Liberty’s equity interests, the USD1 stablecoin could facilitate indirect financial gains or undue foreign influence over US policy, particularly if foreign entities invest in or use the stablecoin.”

Trump’s USD1 stablecoin deepens concerns over conflicts of interest

WLFI makes up a sizeable chuck of Trump’s estimated net worth. Source: Fortune

Corey Frayer, who worked on crypto policy at the SEC under former President Joe Biden, said that the project’s emphasis on cross-border payments was particularly worrisome and that foreign entities may invest as a way to gain favor with Trump.

“There’s a lot of opacity around this marketplace, and prior relationships with illicit finance,” Frayer told The New York Times. 

US policymakers have already noted the possibility for foreign influence following the launch of Trump’s eponymous memecoin in January.

At the time, Democratic Representative Maxine Waters — a top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee — wrote that “Anyone globally, even individuals who have been sanctioned by the U.S. or banned from our capital markets, can now trade and profit off of $TRUMP through various unregulated platforms.”

Related: Congress repealed the IRS broker rule, but can it regulate DeFi?

In addition to potential foreign influence, observers are concerned that Trump’s crypto ventures could threaten market stability and integrity, and open up global markets to manipulation. 

Referencing USD1, Heath Mayo — the founder of the Trump-alternative conservative movement Principles First — said that a sitting president issuing an instrument backed by public debt should be illegal, adding that the project had “terrible incentives and corrupt use of US taxpayer credit.”

Rossow said that the president’s role in a stablecoin project while at the same time working to craft stablecoin legislation in the form of the GENIUS Act is “a constitutional violation that could destabilize regulatory integrity.”

Trump’s influence over the industry and ability to drop enforcement actions against crypto executives who support him creates “an uneven playing field, disadvantaging competitors and violating principles of equal protection under the law.”

What options do regulators have regarding Trump’s crypto conflicts of interest

Trump, who has long stated an affinity with former President Andrew Jackson, seems to be holding to the latter’s strategy of acknowledging judicial rulings — and then doing what he wants regardless. 

The presidential administration has already shown that it is willing to defy orders from federal judges when, earlier this month, it ignored a verbal order from a federal judge to turn around two planes full of alleged gang members bound for the Terrorism Confinement Center in El Salvador. 

Regarding crypto, Senator Elizabeth Warren has already called for an ethics probe into Trump’s crypto activities. She said that the president’s memecoin “massively enriched Trump personally, enabled a mechanism for the crypto industry to funnel cash to him, and created a volatile financial asset that allows anyone in the world to financially speculate on Trump’s political fortunes.”

Trump’s USD1 stablecoin deepens concerns over conflicts of interest

Warren, a long-time crypto critic, has taken aim at WLFI. Source: Senate Banking Committee

The probe, if it had a chance to begin with, doesn’t appear to have gone anywhere, and Congressional Republicans are busy working on the GENIUS Act, which even has the support of a handful of Democrats. 

What, if anything, can be done?

Rossow said that, despite changes in SEC leadership, other agencies like the Financial Crime Enforcement Network could still pursue investigations. 

He also noted that state-level action from local regulators and Attorneys General is “not just possible but imperative, especially in states with robust consumer protection laws.

He added that international regulatory bodies could exert pressure, stating that the “global nature” of crypto means that foreign governments could work for better oversight and more robust regulations. 

Related: Who’s running in Trump’s race to make US a ‘Bitcoin superpower?’

In any case, he said that the current situation demands multi-faceted action as there is currently a need to “safeguard the principles of fair governance and maintain the US’s credibility in the global financial system.”

Some in the crypto industry see no problem at all and believe the president’s involvement is just another sign of how the industry is reaching mainstream appeal. 

Chris Barrett, senior director of communications at Chainlink, congratulated the project, stating that “The global financial world runs on the U.S. dollar, and stablecoins are about to make that even harder to change.”

Arnoud Star Busman, CEO of European stablecoin issuer Quantoz Payments, told Cointelegraph that USD1 is reflective of “increasing validation from world-leading brands that stablecoins are carving the path for the mainstream financial industry to access crypto assets and tokenized real-world assets.”

The Blockchain Association — an industry lobby group — declined Cointelegraph’s request for comment. 

Magazine: Arbitrum co-founder skeptical of move to based and native rollups: Steven Goldfeder

Read more at cointelegraph.com

Trump’s USD1 stablecoin deepens concerns over conflicts of interest

World Liberty Financial (WLFI), the Trump family’s crypto project, is planning to release a stablecoin, raising concern over the US president’s exposure to the digital asset industry.

The project released a memecoin immediately prior to President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the price of which skyrocketed and crashed soon after, causing many to accuse WLFI of a pump-and-dump scheme. 

WLFI has also made multimillion-dollar purchases of crypto tokens immediately prior to important crypto-related events the president has attended or announcements influencing the industry. WLFI purchased $20 million of various tokens ahead of the March 7 White House Crypto Summit. 

As World Liberty Financial’s portfolio grows and regulator oversight disappears from the crypto industry, observers and legal scholars are becoming increasingly concerned over conflicts of interest within the Trump administration. 

Trump’s USD1 stablecoin deepens concerns over conflicts of interest

Son Eric Trump pumps his father’s memecoin ahead of the inauguration. Source: Eric Trump

Trump’s stablecoin USD1 riddled with liabilities 

WLFI announced on March 25 that it will launch the new stablecoin USD1, “100% backed by short-term US government treasuries, US dollar deposits, and other cash equivalents.”

WLFI co-founder Zach Witkoff said in the announcement that the coin can be used for “seamless, secure cross-border transactions.” 

News of USD1’s forthcoming release came just days after WLFI secured more than $500 million through the sale of its own $WLFI tokens. 

Observers have already begun to raise the alarm about the possible security risks posed by a stablecoin connected to the president. There are also concerns over the possibility of market manipulation and violations of the emoluments clause of the US Constitution — a section of the document that protects against undue influence over American leaders. 

As regards the latter, cyber and digital media attorney Andrew Rossow told Cointelegraph that the stablecoin is “a direct affront to constitutional safeguards meant to prevent conflicts of interest.”

“With Trump and his family controlling 60% of World Liberty’s equity interests, the USD1 stablecoin could facilitate indirect financial gains or undue foreign influence over US policy, particularly if foreign entities invest in or use the stablecoin.”

Trump’s USD1 stablecoin deepens concerns over conflicts of interest

WLFI makes up a sizeable chuck of Trump’s estimated net worth. Source: Fortune

Corey Frayer, who worked on crypto policy at the SEC under former President Joe Biden, said that the project’s emphasis on cross-border payments was particularly worrisome and that foreign entities may invest as a way to gain favor with Trump.

“There’s a lot of opacity around this marketplace, and prior relationships with illicit finance,” Frayer told The New York Times. 

US policymakers have already noted the possibility for foreign influence following the launch of Trump’s eponymous memecoin in January.

At the time, Democratic Representative Maxine Waters — a top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee — wrote that “Anyone globally, even individuals who have been sanctioned by the U.S. or banned from our capital markets, can now trade and profit off of $TRUMP through various unregulated platforms.”

Related: Congress repealed the IRS broker rule, but can it regulate DeFi?

In addition to potential foreign influence, observers are concerned that Trump’s crypto ventures could threaten market stability and integrity, and open up global markets to manipulation. 

Referencing USD1, Heath Mayo — the founder of the Trump-alternative conservative movement Principles First — said that a sitting president issuing an instrument backed by public debt should be illegal, adding that the project had “terrible incentives and corrupt use of US taxpayer credit.”

Rossow said that the president’s role in a stablecoin project while at the same time working to craft stablecoin legislation in the form of the GENIUS Act is “a constitutional violation that could destabilize regulatory integrity.”

Trump’s influence over the industry and ability to drop enforcement actions against crypto executives who support him creates “an uneven playing field, disadvantaging competitors and violating principles of equal protection under the law.”

What options do regulators have regarding Trump’s crypto conflicts of interest

Trump, who has long stated an affinity with former President Andrew Jackson, seems to be holding to the latter’s strategy of acknowledging judicial rulings — and then doing what he wants regardless. 

The presidential administration has already shown that it is willing to defy orders from federal judges when, earlier this month, it ignored a verbal order from a federal judge to turn around two planes full of alleged gang members bound for the Terrorism Confinement Center in El Salvador. 

Regarding crypto, Senator Elizabeth Warren has already called for an ethics probe into Trump’s crypto activities. She said that the president’s memecoin “massively enriched Trump personally, enabled a mechanism for the crypto industry to funnel cash to him, and created a volatile financial asset that allows anyone in the world to financially speculate on Trump’s political fortunes.”

Trump’s USD1 stablecoin deepens concerns over conflicts of interest

Warren, a long-time crypto critic, has taken aim at WLFI. Source: Senate Banking Committee

The probe, if it had a chance to begin with, doesn’t appear to have gone anywhere, and Congressional Republicans are busy working on the GENIUS Act, which even has the support of a handful of Democrats. 

What, if anything, can be done?

Rossow said that, despite changes in SEC leadership, other agencies like the Financial Crime Enforcement Network could still pursue investigations. 

He also noted that state-level action from local regulators and Attorneys General is “not just possible but imperative, especially in states with robust consumer protection laws.

He added that international regulatory bodies could exert pressure, stating that the “global nature” of crypto means that foreign governments could work for better oversight and more robust regulations. 

Related: Who’s running in Trump’s race to make US a ‘Bitcoin superpower?’

In any case, he said that the current situation demands multi-faceted action as there is currently a need to “safeguard the principles of fair governance and maintain the US’s credibility in the global financial system.”

Some in the crypto industry see no problem at all and believe the president’s involvement is just another sign of how the industry is reaching mainstream appeal. 

Chris Barrett, senior director of communications at Chainlink, congratulated the project, stating that “The global financial world runs on the U.S. dollar, and stablecoins are about to make that even harder to change.”

Arnoud Star Busman, CEO of European stablecoin issuer Quantoz Payments, told Cointelegraph that USD1 is reflective of “increasing validation from world-leading brands that stablecoins are carving the path for the mainstream financial industry to access crypto assets and tokenized real-world assets.”

The Blockchain Association — an industry lobby group — declined Cointelegraph’s request for comment. 

Magazine: Arbitrum co-founder skeptical of move to based and native rollups: Steven Goldfeder

Read more at cointelegraph.com

BlackRock ‘BUIDL’ tokenized fund triples in 3 weeks as Bitcoin stalls

Update March 26, 2:36 pm UTC: This article has been updated to include quotes from Brickken CEO Edwin Mata.

BlackRock’s Ethereum-native tokenized money market fund has more than tripled in value over the past three weeks, nearing the $2 billion mark amid rising demand for safe-haven digital assets.

BlackRock’s USD Institutional Digital Liquidity Fund (BUIDL) saw an over three-fold increase over the past three weeks, from $615 million to $1.87 billion, according to Token Terminal data shared by Leon Waidmann, head of research at Onchain Foundation, a Web3 intelligence platform.

BlackRock ‘BUIDL’ tokenized fund triples in 3 weeks as Bitcoin stalls

BlackRock BUIDL capital deployed by chain. Source: Token Terminal, Leon Waidmann

“BUIDL fund TVL exploded from $615M → $1.87B in just 3 weeks. The tokenization wave is hitting faster than most realize,” the researcher wrote in a March 26 X post.

BlackRock’s BUIDL fund is part of the wider real-world asset (RWA) tokenization sector, which refers to financial products and tangible assets such as real estate and fine art minted on the blockchain, increasing investor accessibility to and trading opportunities for these assets.

The surge in BlackRock’s fund reflects a growing institutional appetite for tokenized RWAs due to more regulatory clarity, according to Edwin Mata, co-founder and CEO of Brickken, a European RWA platform.

“The US is witnessing a notable shift toward a more crypto-friendly regulatory environment,” the CEO told Cointelegraph, adding:

“The SEC has recently concluded several investigations without enforcement actions, including those involving Immutable, Coinbase and Kraken. This trend suggests a move toward clearer regulatory frameworks that support innovation in the digital asset space.”

Related: Crypto markets will be pressured by trade wars until April: Analyst

BlackRock launched BUIDL in March 2024 in partnership with tokenization platform Securitize. In a recent Fortune report, Securitize chief operating officer Michael Sonnenshein said the fund aims to make offchain assets “unboring.” 

RWAs reached a new cumulative all-time high of over $17 billion on Feb. 3, following Bitcoin’s (BTC) decline below $100,000.

Related: Redemption arcs of 2024: Ripple’s victory, memecoins’ rise, RWA growth

RWAs near $20B record high amid Bitcoin’s lack of momentum

The total value of onchain RWAs is less than 0.5% away from surpassing the $20 billion mark, with a total cumulative value of $19.57 billion, according to data from RWA.xyz.

BlackRock ‘BUIDL’ tokenized fund triples in 3 weeks as Bitcoin stalls

RWA global market dashboard. Source: RWA.xyz

RWAs will likely rise to new all-time highs in 2025 as they attract investor interest amid Bitcoin’s lack of momentum, according to Alexander Loktev, chief revenue officer at P2P.org, an institutional staking and crypto infrastructure provider.

“Given the recent moves we’ve seen from major financial institutions, particularly BlackRock and JPMorgan’s growing involvement in tokenization, I believe we could hit $50 billion in TVL,” Loktev told Cointelegraph.

Traditional finance (TradFi) institutions are “starting to view tokenized assets as a serious bridge to DeFi,” driven by institutions looking for digital asset investments with “predictable yields,” added Loktev.

Magazine: Ripple says SEC lawsuit ‘over,’ Trump at DAS, and more: Hodler’s Digest, March 16 – 22

Read more at cointelegraph.com

XRP ETF ‘obvious’ as Polymarket bettors up approval odds to 85%

Crypto community members are growing more optimistic about an XRP exchange-traded fund (ETF) approval following the resolution of a multi-year legal battle between Ripple and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 

On March 19, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse announced the case had concluded. In an X post, the Ripple executive said the SEC will drop its appeal against Ripple, ending the $1.3 billion unregistered securities suit that started in December 2020. 

Following the development, Nate Geraci, president of the advisory firm ETF Store, said on X that the approval of an XRP (XRP) ETF is next. Geraci said it was “obvious” that it’s only a “matter of time” before the SEC approves an XRP ETF. 

The executive predicted that asset managers like BlackRock and Fidelity would be involved in offering the asset. 

Polymarket punters give 86% odds to XRP ETF approval in 2025

Aside from Geraci, users on the crypto betting platform Polymarket also expect approval for an XRP ETF in 2025. On March 26, Polymarket gave an 86% chance that an XRP-based ETF product would be approved this year. 

The bet will resolve if an XRP ETF receives approval from the SEC by Dec. 31. At the time of writing, the betting market had a volume of $55,000. 

XRP ETF ‘obvious’ as Polymarket bettors up approval odds to 85%

Polymarket shows an 86% chance that a Ripple ETF will be approved in 2025. Source: Polymarket

However, users only give a 42% chance that an XRP ETF will be approved before July 31.

Despite being a gambling site, Polymarket users’ predictions have historically been very accurate. A Dune Analytics dashboard studying the accuracy of Polymarket bets showed that the platform had been accurate by over 90% a month before betting markets were resolved. 

Related: SEC plans 4 more crypto roundtables on trading, custody, tokenization, DeFi

XRP price only surged by 5% as the SEC battle ends

Despite being a huge milestone, the end of the multi-year legal battle between Ripple and the SEC failed to move the markets significantly. On March 19, XRP traded at $2.32, according to CoinGecko. At the time of writing, the asset hovers at around $2.44, a 5% increase. 

On March 21, analysts said the new development had already been priced in. Nicolai Sondergaard, research analyst at Nansen, previously told Cointelegraph that the resolution had been widely expected. 

Magazine: Memecoins are ded — But Solana ‘100x better’ despite revenue plunge

Read more at cointelegraph.com

Firms without business models ‘buy Bitcoin’ — Angel investor Jason Calacanis

Prominent US-based angel investor Jason Calacanis poked fun at GameStop’s decision to invest in Bitcoin.

In a March 26 X post, Calacanis suggested that buying Bitcoin (BTC) was a solution well-suited for public companies that do not have a suitable business model:

“If you’re a public company that can’t figure out a business model, buy Bitcoin! This might actually be great advice if [Strategy co-founder Michael Saylor] is gonna buy $1T in Bitcoin.”

Still, Tomas Fanta, principal at crypto investment firm Heartcore, told Cointelegraph that there are tangible long-term benefits to holding Bitcoin on a corporate balance sheet. Among those he listed were long-term price appreciation and theoretically lower correlation to equity markets over time.

“I do disagree with the view, though, that failing companies should be using Bitcoin as the last-ditch strategy,” Fanta said.

Related: GameStop hints at future Bitcoin purchases following board approval

Firms without business models ‘buy Bitcoin’ — Angel investor Jason Calacanis

Source: Jason

Is GameStop’s adoption part of a trend?

Fanta said that while “one case is not enough to gauge a broader trend,” there does appear to be such a trend:

“We may actually be witnessing one of the first experiments with corporate treasury diversification into crypto outside of tech or crypto-aligned companies such as Tesla or Coinbase.”

Saul Rejwan, managing partner at crypto early-stage venture capital firm Masterkey, echoed the sentiment. According to him, companies are increasingly trying to secure themselves against long-term monetary shifts.

“Bitcoin’s role as a corporate reserve asset is no longer fringe; it’s becoming a legitimate play for companies that want to align themselves with a digitally-native, inflation-resistant financial future,” he said. “While not every company will follow suit, GameStop’s move joins a growing chorus,” Rejwan added.

Related: GameStop buying Bitcoin would ‘bake the noodles’ of TradFi: Swan exec

Adopting Bitcoin is adapting to change

Rejwan also noted that historically successful companies often falter when they resist change — citing Nokia as an example — and said adopting Bitcoin could be viewed as a strategic adaptation:

“When done transparently and with proper risk management, Bitcoin can bring long-term resilience to corporate balance sheets — especially for brands with low time preference and strong alignment with digital-native values.”

This idea was also repeated by Georgii Verbitskii, founder of crypto investment app TYMIO, who said that GameStop “could well become the example the market is waiting for.” He added:

“Adding Bitcoin to a corporate balance sheet isn’t just speculative — it has real, long-term upside if executed properly.”

Magazine: SEC’s U-turn on crypto leaves key questions unanswered

Read more at cointelegraph.com

Rumble wallet rolls out with Tether’s USDT for creator payments

Canadian YouTube alternative Rumble announced the launch of its wallet with support for Tether’s USDT stablecoin.

In a March 26 X post, Rumble CEO Chris Pavlovski said Rumble Wallet will be used for content creator monetization. He promised it would work better than most advertisers and that it would use Tether’s USDt (USDT). Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino showed his appreciation for the initiative, referring to it as “A wallet for the people” in an X post.

Related: Tether seeks Big Four firm for its first full financial audit — Report

A flurry of investments

The announcement follows Tether investing $775 million in Rumble in late 2024. Ardoino wrote at the time that the company “deeply believes in the fundamental values of freedom of speech and financial freedom.”

Rumble wallet rolls out with Tether’s USDT for creator payments

Source: Paolo Ardoino

It is one of several major investments recently made by the $143 billion stablecoin issuer. Reports from 2024 indicated that Tether was the seventh-largest holder of US Treasury securities globally, surpassing many nation-states.

In February, Tether acquired a majority stake in Juventus FC, a major Series A football club based in Turin, Italy. During the same month, the stablecoin operator sought to acquire a majority stake in South American agribusiness firm Adecoagro.

Rumble also recently began investing its capital, acquiring over $17 million worth of Bitcoin (BTC) earlier this month. The firm announced its new strategy in late November 2024, when it voiced its intention to spend up to $20 million adding Bitcoin to its balance sheet.

Rumble was founded in late 2013 as a YouTube alternative for small content creators. The platform saw a significant influx of users from 2020 onward, at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Viewership increased from 1.6 million users in 2020 around the US election time to 31.9 million by the end of the first quarter of 2021.

Related: Trump Media looks to partner with Crypto.com to launch ETFs

Rumble’s foray into the US

Venture capitalists backed the platform, including current US Vice President J.D. Vance and former PayPal CEO Peter Thiel. At the end of 2021, US President Donald Trump-linked Trump Media and Technology Group announced a partnership with Rumble, which would “deliver video and streaming for TRUTH Social.” Trump wrote in the announcement:

“TMTG continues to align with service providers who do not discriminate against political ideology. Therefore, I have selected the Rumble Cloud to serve as a critical backbone for TMTG infrastructure.”

In 2022, Trump’s social media platform Truth Social also migrated to Rumble’s cloud platform. TMTG CEO Devin Nunes said at the time that “Truth Social and Rumble took a major stride toward rescuing the internet from the grip of the Big Tech tyrants.”

The partnership between the two companies grew stronger as time went on. Also in 2022, Truth Social joined Rumble’s ad platform as its first publisher. This year, TMTG joined Rumble in a lawsuit to halt alleged censorship in Brazil.

Magazine: Trump’s crypto ventures raise conflict of interest, insider trading questions

Read more at cointelegraph.com